Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533712›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Compact high power, medium energy electron accelerator for treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl contamination in water.

Tasha Spohr, Benat Alberdi Esuain, Marc Dirsat, Sven Lederer, Thorsten Kamps

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tasha SpohrHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-7010-7095
Benat Alberdi EsuainHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marc DirsatHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sven LedererHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Thorsten KampsHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron beam water treatment (EBWT) is a promising approach for remediating water contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). In this study, we assess the feasibility of using a compact, high-average-power superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) photoinjector as a source for delivering the electron beam parameters required to initiate PFAS degradation. Our goals are twofold: first, to determine whether such a system can achieve the necessary dose and dose rate through sufficient beam energy and power; and second, to establish an experimental platform for investigating how different beam conditions affect degradation pathways. We envision a compact and mobile SRF-based accelerator that can be deployed at contamination hotspots - such as the former Berlin airport Tegel - offering significantly faster and potentially more effective treatment than conventional remediation methods. Based on theoretical analysis and computational modeling, we identify the SRF photoinjector at Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin (HZB) as a suitable R&D platform. To support experimental validation, we developed a proof-of-concept in-air beamline optimized for balancing dose deposition and thermal management. This setup will enable the systematic study of key operational parameters, including dose rate, energy deposition, and thermal stability, under controlled beam conditions.

Indexed as

ElectronsWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationWaterWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID41533712
PMCPMC12803471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.