Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533682›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Observations of marine animal interactions with a small tidal turbine.

Emma Cotter, Christopher Bassett, Paul Murphy, Mitchell Scott, Alexa Runyan, Jood M Almokharrak, Lucy G Kao, Lillian M Ovall, Suni A McMillen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emma CotterCoastal Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-9063
Christopher BassettApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0534-0664
Paul MurphyMarineSitu, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Mitchell ScottMarineSitu, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alexa RunyanMarineSitu, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5774-476X
Jood M AlmokharrakApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Lucy G KaoApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Lillian M OvallMarineSitu, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Suni A McMillenApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of collisions between animals and operating tidal turbines remains a concern in the scientific and regulatory communities. A sensor package including optical cameras was deployed to monitor animal interactions with a small-scale (1 m2) cross-flow tidal turbine. The turbine was deployed in Washington State, USA for 141 days at a site with peak flow speeds of 2.5 m/s. We analyze optical camera imagery spanning 109 days of turbine operation. The analyzed images contain 1044 observations of fish, fish schools, seabirds, or seals in the vicinity of the turbine. No instances of collision with seabirds or seals were observed. Seabirds were only observed during daylight hours and while the turbine was stationary. Both seals and fish were observed during both day and night and while the turbine was stationary and rotating. Four fish were observed colliding with the moving turbine and in all but one case the animals swam away following the collision. Over the same period of time, over fifty times more fish (224 individual fish and 5 fish schools) were observed passing the moving turbine without collision. Fish encounters were likely under counted due to the difficulty in discerning small fish from plant matter in the water column. These observations represent the first optical camera imagery showing fish, bird, and marine mammal interactions with a tidal turbine in North America. In addition to quantitative and qualitative discussion of the implications of our observations for collision risk, we discuss lessons learned on sampling schemes and deployment of machine learning for detection of animals to inform future data collection strategies in future monitoring campaigns.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsBehavior, AnimalFishesAnimalsBirdsWashington

Identifiers

PMID41533682
PMCPMC12803451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.