Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533681›Full record

SynthesisScience progress

The application of machine learning for infant cries classification and pathological cries detection: A systematic review.

Sudhathai Sirithepmontree, Nattasit Katchamat, Sasitara Nuampa

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sudhathai SirithepmontreeSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0495-1675
Nattasit KatchamatSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-1756
Sasitara NuampaFaculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1325-8954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to systematically review and synthesize the studies on the application of machine learning for classifying infant cry types, identifying pathological cries, and evaluating the accuracy of infant cry recognition.MethodsThis review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024600969). The literature search was conducted on four data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and IEEE Xplore. The included studies focused on machine learning-based classification of infants' needs cries or pathological cries. These were published in English between January 1, 2014 and October 31, 2024. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.ResultsOf 919 studies were identified, 17 were included in the final synthesis. Machine learning can classify infant cries into two main types: infant needs' cries and pathological cries, with some studies addressing both. Needs-related cries comprised nine subtypes, while pathological cries included six subtypes. Classification accuracy varied by machine learning classifier and the features used, ranging from 44.5% to 99.82%. The highest accuracy for infant needs' cries was hunger and pain cries at 99.82% using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) classifier with constant-Q cepstral coefficients features. For pathological cries, the highest accuracy was for detecting deafness (99.42% to 99.82%), using a genetic selection of Fuzzy Model and a GMM classifier.ConclusionsMachine learning shows strong potential for accurately classifying infant cries and detecting pathologies. Future research should prioritize developing diverse cry datasets to improve model generalizability, evaluating performance in real-world settings, and integrating cry analysis with physiological signals to enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

CryingMachine LearningHumansInfantInfant, Newbornclassificationinfant cryinfant healthMachine learningpathological crysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41533681
PMCPMC12804663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.