ArticleIEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
SSE-TSR: An Approach to Integrate Secondary Structure Elements Into Triangular Spatial Relationships for Protein Classification.
Article in IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein structures are fundamental to understanding biological function, yet many detailed similarities remain hidden from conventional alignment-based or 3D superposition methods. Triangular Spatial Relationship (TSR) offers an alignment-free encoding of backbone geometry; however, classical TSR ignores the context of secondary structure elements (SSEs), such as helices, strands, and coils. To address this, we introduce SSE-TSR, which enriches each TSR key by categorizing it into one of 18 helix-strand-coil combination labels derived from DSSP-style annotations in PDB HELIX/SHEET records. By mapping the protein representation involving SSE-TSR keys into a sparse tensor, SSE-TSR compactly captures both tertiary geometry and local secondary motifs. We evaluated SSE-TSR on four datasets, two structural (CATH-based, 9.2 K; SCOP-based, 7.0 K) and two functional (published, 7.8 K; new, 7.2 K), using a 3D convolutional neural network. On structure-based tasks, SSE-TSR noticeably boosts accuracy from 96.00% to 98.33% (CATH-based) and from 95.46% to 99.00% (SCOP-based). On functional tasks, it yields modest yet consistent gains (e.g., from 99.41% to 99.50% and 95.83% to 98.83%). Comparisons to Foldseek confirm competitive accuracy across diverse tasks. Additionally, the sparse tensor representation enables memory-efficient handling of large-scale datasets, making SSE-TSR practical for extensive bioinformatics analyses. These results demonstrate SSE-TSR as a scalable, interpretable, and robust method, enhancing protein classification and structural bioinformatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.