ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Optimized CRISPR-Cas9 system for efficient engineering of ecDNA in cancer cells.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extrachromosomal DNA as a platform for epigenetic reprogramming in cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) amplification represents an emerging mechanism underlying oncogene amplification, tumor heterogeneity, and drug resistance in cancer. However, the biology of ecDNA remains poorly understood because tools to engineer ecDNAs and precisely monitor their dynamics are limited. In particular, genome engineering strategies have not been established for ecDNA, which exists in tens to hundreds of copies within a single cell. Here, we report a systematic validation of ecDNA editing using standard CRISPR-Cas9 system and optimized CRISPR-Cas9 system with safeguard single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs), in which the addition of cytosine extensions finely reduces excessive Cas9 activity. The conventional CRISPR-Cas9 system induced severe cytotoxicity and markedly reduced ecDNA copy number, together with frequent micronucleus formation. Knock-in efficiency was remarkably low, highlighting an intrinsic difficulty in editing ecDNA. In contrast, the safeguard sgRNA strategy not only alleviated cytotoxicity and ecDNA loss in a cytosine-length-dependent manner but also enabled efficient knock-in into multiple ecDNA per cell. Computational simulations suggested that the degree and temporal patterns of multiple DNA cleavage events shape cell death, micronucleus formation, and rapid expansion of knock-in ecDNA. Collectively, optimization of Cas9 activity using safeguard sgRNAs enables efficient and nondisruptive ecDNA engineering, providing a powerful tool to study ecDNA biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.