Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533477›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2026

Early birds and night owls: natural variation of circadian traits in plants.

Ann Feke, Eva M Farré

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ann FekeDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8246-0056
Eva M FarréDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1566-7572

Funding

National Science Foundation IOS-2226136National Science Foundation IOS-PGRP-1950376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian clocks have long been hypothesized to tightly link cellular and physiological processes to the appropriate time within the 24-hour cycle of the Earth's daily rotation. According to this hypothesis, circadian rhythms with cycle lengths that differ significantly from 24 hours would be disadvantageous, as they would generate a desynchronization between the endogenous and exogenous cycles that would place stress upon an organism through the required daily resetting at dawn. However, recent work has demonstrated that endogenous circadian cycles that differ from 24 hours by 2 hours or more are prevalent within the green lineage. Herein, we review recent work on the prevalence of, and adaptive advantages associated with, natural variation in circadian cycles. Based on known photoperiodic sensing mechanisms we also describe a set of principles that allow the same changes in circadian period to cause different plant responses. This fine-tuning of clock output pathways provides a flexible mechanism enabling plants to use a wide range of life history strategies for plant adaptation to different environmental niches. Further studies are needed to determine how variations of the clock and other signals are integrated in different plants. These studies highlight the circadian clocks' position as a prime adaptation target for migration of plant species into new environmental ranges.

Indexed as

BirdsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlantsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsPhotoperiodAdaptationcircadian clockcircadian periodfloweringnatural variationphotoperiod

Identifiers

PMID41533477
PMCPMC13080377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.