Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533377›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Adverse Events After Metastases-Directed Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Biological Cancer Therapy.

Esmée L Looman, Stephanie G C Kroeze, Jana Schaule, Mathieu Spaas, Klaus Henning Kahl, Joost J C Verhoeff, Famke L Schneiders, Oliver Blanck, Fabian Lohaus, Susanne Rogers and 16 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Errors in Figure and Byline.JAMA network open · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Esmée L LoomanUniversity Hospital Zürich, Radiation Oncology, Zürich, Switzerland.
Stephanie G C KroezeUniversity Hospital Zürich, Radiation Oncology, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jana SchauleUniversity Hospital Zürich, Radiation Oncology, Zürich, Switzerland.
Mathieu SpaasGhent University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Ghent, Belgium.
Klaus Henning KahlUniversitätsklinikum Augsburg, Radiation Oncology, Augsburg, Germany.
Joost J C VerhoeffUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Famke L SchneidersAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Oliver BlanckUniversity Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Radiation Oncology, Kiel, Germany.
Fabian LohausTechnische Universität Dresden, Radiation Oncology, Dresden, Germany.
Susanne RogersCantonal Hospital Aarau, Radiation Oncology Center Mittelland, Aarau, Switzerland.
David KaulCharité-University Hospital Berlin, Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany.
Sergi BenaventeVall d'Hebron University Hospital Campus, Radiation Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Stephanie E CombsTechnical University Munich, Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany.
Georgios SkazikisSchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Radiation Oncology, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Kynann P AnindithaKlinikum Stuttgart, Radiation Oncology, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ilinca PoppDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Friederike L A KoppeInstituut Verbeeten, Radiation Oncology, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Hans GeinitzOrdensklinikum Linz, Radiation Oncology, Linz, Austria.
Katrien de JaegerCatharina Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Shankar SivaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, Australia.
Susanne SteraUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Radiation Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany.
Andrea WittigNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Victor LewitzkiNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Franziska EckertUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Radiation Oncology, Tübingen, Germany.
Markus M SchymallaPhilipps-University Marburg, Radiation Oncology, Marburg, Germany.
Matthias GuckenbergerUniversity Hospital Zürich, Radiation Oncology, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Metastases-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is increasingly performed in patients with metastatic or oligometastatic cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and small-molecule drugs (SMs). However, little is known about potential interactions between SRT and biological cancer therapy (BCT). Objective: To prospectively investigate adverse events associated with SRT combined with concurrent BCT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, prospective, multicenter, noninterventional registry cohort study (Toxicity and Efficacy of Combined Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Systemic Targeted or Immune Therapy [TOaSTT]) was conducted between July 2017 and August 2019 with a 24-month follow-up. Patients from 27 centers whose cancer was treated with metastases-directed SRT concurrently with BCT were eligible. Analyses were performed in January 2025. Exposure: Patients treated with SRT for intracranial or extracranial metastases and concurrent (within ≤30 days) BCT. Indication for treatment, decision on the radiotherapy dose and fractionation, as well as interruption of BCT, were left to the discretion of the treating clinician. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was severe (at least grade 3) adverse events of combined modality treatment, as graded by the treating physician. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. Results: In total, 514 SRTs (271 cranial and 243 extracranial) concurrent with BCT were performed in 433 patients (median [IQR] age, 62 [54-70 years; 275 male [63.5%]). In 315 SRTs (61.3%) patients received ICIs, whereas in 150 SRTs (29.2%), patients received SMs and in 49 SRTs (9.5%) patients received mAbs. In 430 SRTs (83.7%), BCT had been initiated in patients before SRT, while 71 of 392 patients (18.1%) paused BCT during SRT. Severe (≥grade 3) acute adverse events were observed in 27 of 506 treatments (5.3%; 3 patients with grade 5 events), and severe late adverse events were observed in 29 of 459 patients (6.3%; 2 patients with grade 5 events). SRT with uninterrupted BCT was not associated with increased severe acute or late adverse events (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 0.87-6.22). Interruption of BCT during SRT was not associated with worse PFS and OS after correction for performance status and histologic type (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61-1.09; P = .17). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 433 patients, severe adverse events after SRT and concurrent BCT were uncommon (<10%), continuing BCT during SRT was not associated with increased risk of severe adverse events, and interrupting BCT was not associated with worse OS when correcting for patients' performance status. These findings suggest a favorable safety profile of metastases-directed SBRT in combined modality treatment settings.

Indexed as

Neoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41533377
PMCPMC12805445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.