ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026
Pro-Environmental Volunteering in Chinese University Youth: Peer Selection, Influence, and the Roles of Social Media and Social Self-Efficacy.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pro-environmental volunteering is a key way in which university students contribute to climate action, yet little is known about how such behavior diffuses through peer networks, whether peer influence outweighs homophilous selection, and how these processes unfold within digitally mediated Chinese university contexts. To address these gaps, this study examined dual social-network mechanisms, digital socialization, and social self-efficacy in the spread of pro-environmental volunteering during the first year at university. Data came from 1,151 first-year students (M age = 17.91, SD = 0.78; 51.9% female) nested in complete friendship networks across six Chinese universities and surveyed twice over six months. Longitudinal stochastic actor-oriented models were used to disentangle homophilous selection from peer influence, and regression-based mediation and moderation analyses tested social self-efficacy as a psychological pathway and social media usage as a contextual moderator. Peer influence on pro-environmental volunteering was substantially stronger than homophilous selection (influence–selection ratio = 2.64, 95% CI [1.82, 3.91]), indicating that behavior spread primarily through post-relationship socialization rather than friendship choice. Social media usage did not significantly alter the tendency to befriend behaviorally similar peers, but higher overall usage selectively amplified peer influence, with significant effects emerging only above moderate usage levels. Social self-efficacy partially mediated the longitudinal association between peers’ volunteering and individual volunteering, accounting for 54% of the total effect. These findings integrate network co-evolution, digital socialization, and social-cognitive perspectives to clarify how environmentally significant behaviors disseminate within youth peer networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.