ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2026
Italian translation of the Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS-IT) for ARFID surveillance in a dietetic service.
Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral versions of the Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) have been developed in recent years to adapt the questionnaire to different languages and clinical samples. An Italian version is still lacking. From the perspective of a highly specialized Eating Disorder Unit in Milano, ARFID's phenomenology may be mimicked by other peculiar dietary habits or other eating disorders. Screening for this pathological conduct is necessary to assess a correct treatment frame for potentially serious disordered feeding behavior.
methodsClinical experts in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Dietetics collaborated in the translation process. The whole methodology involved several steps: (I) Italian translation; (II) backward translation from Italian to English; (III) assessing the conformity between the original English and retranslated questionnaires; (IV) testing the translated version on patients; (V) evaluating the degree of comprehensibility of the translated scale. KEY POINTS: The Italian version of the NIAS (NIAS-IT) was administered online to 23 consecutive outpatients of a Dietetic department. For the most part, the sample of Italian native speakers found the translated version of the questionnaire to be comprehensible and easy to read.
conclusionsThe Italian version of the NIAS is perfectly comprehensible and can be applied to the Italian population for both clinical and research purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.