ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Development of a patient-centered conceptual disease model in Ring 14 syndrome: a patient-centered model of lived experience.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient and caregiver knowledge as a driver of basic science.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRing 14 Syndrome is a rare genetic disorder caused by an anomaly in the 14th chromosome that often leads to intractable epilepsy, moderate to severe intellectual disabilities, slow growth, ocular abnormalities, and more. The presentation and severity of symptoms can greatly vary, making Ring 14 syndrome a complex condition to understand, manage, and treat. Conceptual disease models, also known as disease concept models, provide a formal framework based on the lived experience of patients and families that helps to describe the functional and quality of life impacts of a disease across various domains using qualitative methods.
methodsTo inform the development of a conceptual disease model on Ring 14 Syndrome, 17 caregivers representing 12 patients with Ring 14 Syndrome participated in semi-structured interviews over the course of four months. Data were analyzed using a mix of deductive and inductive inquiry through NVivo Software. Concepts were grouped into domains of patient symptoms and caregiver symptoms, with patient symptoms consisting of two sub-domains: functional impacts (which included cognitive impacts, physical impacts, behavioral impacts, and social-emotional-expressive impacts) and quality of life impacts (which included ADLs, medication side effects, and school/social/community). Caregiver impacts were categorized by mental health, family and social aspects, and medical care.
resultsPatient impacts listed under the cognitive and physical categories align closely with patient impacts referenced in the medical literature. However, impacts listed under the patient quality of life domain as well as the caregiver domain are inadequately represented in the literature, suggesting that the patient perspective has previously been neglected in the medical literature on Ring 14 Syndrome. Further, the numerous mental and physical health impacts on caregivers, grouped with the negative quality of life impacts on Ring 14 patients themselves, warrants further attention, as both have profound effects on health-related quality of life. Finally, while many of the impacts listed in the conceptual disease model may be considered negative aspects of the disorder, there were also positive impacts identified (such as happy demeanor, resilience, and social support) by the community as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.