Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Ten-year changes in risk factors for requiring treatment of retinopathy of prematurity in extremely low birth weight infants: a multicenter study in Tokyo.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate 10-year changes in risk factors associated with treatment required for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in extremely low birth weight infants. STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study.
methodsData for extremely low birth weight infants born in 2011 (Group 1) and those born in 2020-2021 (Group 2) were extracted from the Neonatal Research Network of Japan, with a total of 564 cases. The frequency of ROP treatment-related risk factors and results of multivariate analyses were compared between the two groups. Missing data in covariates were handled using multiple imputation.
resultsGroup 2 had a significantly lower birth weight (p=0.038), gestational age (p=0.037), and Apgar scores (p<0.001), than Group 1. The frequencies of resuscitation with intubation (p=0.030), oxygen therapy beyond 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (p<0.001), chronic lung disease (p=0.012), gastrointestinal perforation (p=0.030), and red blood cell transfusion (p=0.018) were higher in Group 2 than in Group 1. However, the incidence and treatment rate of ROP decreased over time. The multivariate analysis shows that mechanical ventilation for 60 days or more is a strong independent risk factor for ROP treatment in Group 1, but this effect disappeared in Group 2.
conclusionBirth weight and gestational age of extremely low birth weight infants born in Tokyo have decreased significantly compared with 10 years previously, and the severity of ROP has not increased. Advances in respiratory management may have contributed to reducing the risk of developing severe ROP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.