Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533238›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2026

Comparison of pathogen and resistance profiles in bloodstream infections using conventional methods and multiplex RT-PCR.

Derya Çakır Erdoğan, Serpil Semiha Çuğlan, Gülşah Ece Özmerdiven, Faruk Çelik, Arzu İrvem

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A review of bloodstream infections-pathogens, pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, treatment methods-challenges and future aspects.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Derya Çakır ErdoğanKanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4894-3844
Serpil Semiha ÇuğlanKanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9074-1163
Gülşah Ece ÖzmerdivenKanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6456-5236
Faruk ÇelikAlaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-0277
Arzu İrvemKanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. arzuirvem@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1307-4538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in hospitalized patients with sepsis. Rapid identification of pathogens and their resistance profiles is critical for timely initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy, as delays can substantially increase mortality. This prospective study aimed to compare conventional culture-based methods with Multiplex Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) for the early detection of pathogens and resistance genes in blood culture samples exhibiting positive signals.

methodsA total of 100 hospitalized patients with suspected sepsis were included in the study. Blood culture samples were analyzed using both conventional culture methods and multiplex real-time PCR. Conventional methods identified 108 microorganisms, whereas RT-PCR detected pathogens in 90 samples, After the blood culture bottle signaled positive, the samples were inoculated onto culture media. Subsequently, multiplex PCR was performed, and results were obtained within approximately 2–4 h. The subcultured samples were evaluated the following day, identified using MALDI-TOF MS, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed. Both identification and susceptibility results were reported on the second day.along with an additional 14 microorganisms that were not recovered by culture.

resultsResistance gene profiles identified by RT-PCR demonstrated high concordance with phenotypic resistance results, including mecA/C, VIM, NDM, KPC, and vanA genes. Nevertheless, discrepancies such as very major errors (5.1%) were observed, indicating areas requiring further investigation.

conclusionMultiplex RT-PCR serves as a valuable adjunct to conventional culture methods, enabling rapid pathogen identification and resistance profiling. Its integration into routine diagnostic workflows may enhance clinical outcomes by facilitating timely, targeted therapy for septic patients.

Indexed as

BacteremiaDrug Resistance, BacterialMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBlood CultureHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial AgentsBloodstream infections (BSIs)Molecular diagnosticsPathogen identificationResistance gene profiling

Identifiers

PMID41533238
PMCPMC12804235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.