ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Clinical evaluation of early wound healing and pain management using a novel biomaterial in alveoloplasty: a bilateral comparison study.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEffective wound healing and postoperative pain management are critical in oral and maxillofacial surgery, particularly in alveoloplasty. This study evaluates the efficacy of a novel biomaterial in promoting wound healing and reducing postoperative pain following alveoloplasty. By comparing this biomaterial with conventional treatment methods, the study aims to determine its impact on wound healing, pain relief, and rescue medications required post operatively. MATERIALS AND
methodsA bilateral comparison study was conducted with 14 patients undergoing bilateral alveoloplasty. Standard Alveoloplasty procedure was carried out. On one side, novel biomaterial was placed and sutured. After 21 days, alveoplasty was done on the opposite side and novel biomaterial was not used. Post operative wound healing was assessed using Southampton wound healing scale on post-operative day 1 (POD 1), POD 3, POD 7. Pain score and rescue medications required were noted and compared.
resultsResults indicate that the novel biomaterial significantly enhances wound healing, demonstrating reduced inflammation, accelerated tissue regeneration, and improved epithelialization. Additionally, patients treated with the biomaterial reported lower postoperative pain levels compared to the control group. It was also noticed that the rescue medications required were less when novel biomaterial was used.
conclusionThis study provides valuable insights into the role of advanced biomaterials in surgical recovery, emphasizing their potential to improve postoperative outcomes in alveoloplasty. The findings support the integration of this biomaterial into clinical practice, offering a promising alternative for enhanced healing and pain control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533197What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.