ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Plaster versus fiberglass splinting for the acute treatment of displaced ankle fractures.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of displaced ankle fractures treated with plaster versus fiberglass splints at a single academic institution.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted at an Academic Level 1 Trauma center of a consecutive series of patients age 18–99 with displaced ankle fractures requiring closed reduction and splinting in the emergency department from January 1, 2017 to April 1, 2022. There was a change in institutional preference from fiberglass to plaster splints at the half-way point of this study period. The primary outcome measure was maintenance of fracture reduction. Secondary measures included treatment cost, reduction quality, and splint-related complications.
resultsThree hundred and sixty-five patients were included in the study, with three hundred and seventy-two ankle fractures. This cohort involves a consecutive series of patients treated before and after switching from fiberglass to plaster splints. Mean age was 49 ± 19.1 years. One hundred and thirty-six males and two hundred and twenty-nine females were enrolled. No significant difference was found between sex, BMI, laterality, or fracture type between fiberglass or plaster splint treatments. Further, no significant difference was found regarding the rate of lost reduction, the incidence of multiple reduction attempts, and the incidence of skin complications between the two splint treatments. Fiberglass splints were found to be close to three times the cost of plaster splints ($21.13 vs. $7.64).
conclusionsThe use of plaster splints is non-inferior and more cost-effective than fiberglass splints for the treatment of ankle fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533192What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.