SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Evaluation of lidocaine as a dual-route prophylaxis in postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis and GRADE evaluation.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) is a common postoperative problem following urinary catheterization. Current pharmacologic options have limited use due to side effects. Lidocaine, with analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antimuscarinic properties, may provide an effective and safer alternative. This study aims to systematically evaluate (1) the efficacy of intravenous (IV) lidocaine compared with normal saline, (2) the efficacy of intravesical lidocaine compared with normal saline, and (3) postoperative outcomes including opioid requirements, as specified in the PROSPERO registration (CRD420251155678). A systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing intravenous or intravesical lidocaine with normal saline for CRBD prevention in adult surgical patients were included. Primary outcomes were CRBD incidence and severity at predefined postoperative time points. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption when reported. Study quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated by GRADE and trial sequential analysis (TSA). Five RCTs, including 463 patients, were analyzed. Lidocaine significantly reduced moderate-to-severe CRBD compared with saline at 0 h (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.32-0.55), 1 h (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28, 0.61), and 2 h (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12, 0.90), but not at 6 h (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.07, 1.22). No significant difference was observed in postoperative opioid consumption (MD - 0.56, 95% CI - 1.14, 0.03). TSA confirmed conclusive results at 0 and 1 h, with high-certainty evidence per GRADE. Both IV and transurethral lidocaine significantly reduce early postoperative CRBD. Lidocaine represents a safe, effective, and easily applicable option for short-term prevention of CRBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.