ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Extremely rare case of isolated cerebellar amyloidoma: a short report.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain amyloidoma is an exceedingly rare localized deposition of amyloid that often radiologically mimics neoplastic or inflammatory disease. We report the case of a previously healthy 53-year-old woman who developed subacute right-hand tremor, pain, and weakness, followed by gait instability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a 35-45 mm hypervascular, infiltrative lesion in the right cerebellar hemisphere, extending into the vermis and middle cerebellar peduncle, with ill-defined margins suggesting of posterior fossa tumor. Subtotal resection was performed. Histopathology confirmed amorphous Congo-red positive amyloid material with perivascular and parenchymal distribution, accompanied by lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates lacking light-chain restriction and therefore without evidence of monoclonality, consistent with amyloidoma. According to the literature, fewer than 100 cases of intra-axial brain amyloidoma have been reported, with infratentorial presentations being extremely uncommon and none previously have been described as an isolated intra-axial cerebellar lesion. This case expands the recognized anatomical spectrum of cerebral amyloidoma, highlights its diagnostic pitfalls, and underscores the essential role of histopathology in establishing the diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.