Trial reportSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
Examining the effectiveness of the PAX-GOOD BEHAVIOUR GAME in improving the mental health and academic outcomes of FIRST NATIONS children in Canada: a clustered randomized controlled trial using administrative data.
Trial report in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePAX Good Behaviour Game (PAX-GBG), a school-based mental health promotion approach, has been shown to improve children's mental health and academic outcomes. Given that these effects have yet to be shown in Indigenous populations, a partnership with First Nations communities was created to evaluate PAX-GBG's effectiveness among First Nations children living in Canada.
methodsIn this clustered randomized controlled trial, we used population-based administrative data that allowed de-identified individual-level linkages. Our cohort from 20 First Nations schools was assigned to PAX-GBG (n = 468) or wait-list control (n = 255). We used multi-level regression modeling and propensity score weighting to estimate group differences in mental health and academic outcomes over time (2011-2020).
resultsPAX-GBG group children had significantly greater decreases in conduct problems (β:-1.08, standard error(se):0.2505, p < .0001), hyperactivity-inattention (β:-1.13, se:0.3617, p = .0018), and peer problems (β:-1.10, se:0.3043, p = .0003) and a greater increase in prosocial scores (β:2.68, se:0.4139, p < .0001) than control group children. The percentage of PAX-GBG group children meeting academic expectations was higher than control group children. However, only third-grade numeracy (odds ratio (OR):4.30, confidence interval (CI):1.34 - 13.77) and eighth-grade reading and writing (OR:2.78, CI:1.01 - 7.67) were statistically significant. We found no evidence that PAX-GBG was associated with less emotional problems, diagnosed mental disorders, or greater student engagement or mathematics.
conclusionThese findings suggest that PAX-GBG is a promising intervention in improving First Nations children's mental health and academic outcomes. What remains unclear is whether these findings are generalizable to all First Nations and how adding supports for program implementation would influence these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.