SynthesisUrolithiasis2026
Progress in the study of irrigation strategies for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a narrative review of the current literature.
Synthesis in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold-standard treatment for large renal and upper ureteral stones. Continuous irrigation is essential for visualization, thermal control, and fragment clearance but carries risks such as hypothermia, electrolyte imbalance, elevated intrarenal pressure, and infection. This review summarizes current evidence on irrigation strategies during PCNL and provides recommendations to mitigate these risks. A systematic literature search was conducted for English-language full-text articles published up to January 2025, using terms related to PCNL and irrigation. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series. Reviews, editorials, and duplicates were excluded. A total of 553 abstracts were screened by a single reviewer, with 28 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Reference lists were hand-searched for additional sources. Evidence highlights multiple determinants of irrigation safety and efficacy. Distilled water and other hypotonic solutions were associated with electrolyte shifts, whereas saline maintained stability. Additives such as tranexamic acid reduced intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rates, and hospital stay without added complications, while povidone-iodine or antibiotic irrigation showed promise in reducing postoperative fever and sepsis. Warmed irrigation fluid mitigated hypothermia but raised concerns of bleeding and thermal injury. Excessive irrigation volume and prolonged operative duration consistently correlated with greater systemic absorption, hemodynamic instability, and electrolyte changes. Irrigation parameters directly influence perioperative safety and outcomes in PCNL. Although isotonic saline remains the standard, antifibrinolytic and antimicrobial additives, individualized temperature management, and optimized volume control represent promising strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.