ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Rethinking patient-centered care through an intersectional lens: pathways to health equity].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-centered care takes into account the individual needs of patients and promotes participatory decision-making. In order for this concept to be implemented, it must recognize the diversity of social realities. This is countered by discrimination based on assumptions and exclusion, which affects the healthcare system at the personal, structural, and institutional levels. Discrimination impedes equitable care, for example with regard to gender, sexual orientation, language barriers, legal access, or social status. An individually oriented patient-centered approach must have an intersectional understanding of experiences of discrimination in order to recognize barriers and address them in care. Discrimination is not only an ethical problem, but also generates avoidable costs. IMPLEMENTATION: International and national approaches are increasingly calling for marginalized groups to be placed at the center of patient-centered care and for inequities in care to be taken into account. There are already numerous initiatives that incorporate the knowledge and experiences of marginalized groups into the design, methodology, and implementation of health-related interventions. It is also important to professionalize the healthcare staff and, thus, also the structural competence in the institutions. The routine collection of data on health inequities and experiences of discrimination supports the development and implementation of concrete strategies. FIELDS OF ACTION: Research, healthcare, and health policy are three central fields of action to which concrete changes must be linked in order to enable equal patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.