ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Intersegmental gait coordination differs by walking ability in subacute stroke.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize intersegmental gait coordination early after stroke (< 2 months post-onset). Stroke participants were divided into two groups based on self-perceived ability to walk faster than their normal speed: single-speed walkers (SSW, n = 18, normal speed 30 ± 13 cm/s) and dual-speed walkers (DSW, n = 17, normal speed 69 ± 26 cm/s, fast speed 100 ± 31 cm/s). Intersegmental coordination was compared between DSW and healthy controls (n = 20, 72 ± 5 cm/s) walking at comparable speeds, SSW and DSW walking at normal speeds, and within DSW walking at normal vs. fast speed. Sagittal plane elevation angles of the thigh, shank, and foot segments were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) to quantify absolute segment loadings on the three principal components and the variances explained by the three principal components. DSW showed only minor differences from healthy controls, indicating relatively preserved coordination. In contrast, SSW demonstrated markedly disrupted intersegmental coordination compared to DSW, particularly in the paretic leg (significant group x side interactions for 7 of 12 PCA parameters). Within the DSW group, increasing speed produced coordination changes that closely paralleled those of healthy controls. A gait speed of 42.3 cm/s best distinguished SSW from DSW (82% sensitivity, 91% specificity). These findings indicate that early after stroke intersegmental gait coordination varies with walking ability. Stroke individuals confident in walking faster than their normal speed exhibit coordination patterns more similar to healthy adults, while those limited to a single, slower speed show marked disruption. The results have implications for early gait training.(246 words)
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.