Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533088›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Private equity in ophthalmology: geographic trends reveal urban-rural disparities in acquisitions and satellite expansion.

Matthew R Heider, Tian E Tian, April M Lee, Prashant D Tailor, Matthew R Starr

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew R Heider *SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Tian E Tian *SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
April M LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Northwell Health/Manhattan Eye and Ear, Great Neck, New York, USA.
Prashant D TailorDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matthew R StarrDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Mstarr1724@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3021-5630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate post-pandemic private equity (PE) acquisition trends among U.S. ophthalmology and optometry practices from 2022 to 2024, emphasizing rural versus urban distribution and subspecialty services.

designRetrospective cross-sectional study.

participantsA total of 550 PE-backed acquisitions of ophthalmology and optometry practices from 2011 to 2024 were identified in the Pitchbook database.

methodsAll practices were categorized using the Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) system, with codes 1-3 defined as urban and 4-10 as rural. Subspecialties (e.g., retina, optometry, oculoplastic, etc.) were assigned based on company websites. Data collection included primary practice locations, last financing dates, and any satellite practices linked to acquired companies. Statistical analysis including linear regression and analysis of variance for comparison of variables was performed to assess acquisition trends, subspecialty distribution, and geographic expansion patterns with a significance level of a P value < 0.05.

main outcome measuresAnnual acquisition counts, urban vs. rural classification, and subspecialty coverage.

resultsBetween 2011 and 2024, 85% of all PE acquisitions targeted urban practices, and acquisitions grew markedly from 2016 to 2021 before peaking in 2021. After that peak, acquisitions declined from 71 in 2022 to 27 in 2024; 96% of the 2022-2024 acquisitions were urban. Geographic analysis showed the Southern region received the highest proportion of recent acquisitions (50%) during 2022-2024, while the Midwest, West, and Northeast received 16%, 19%, and 15% respectively (P = 0.19). Subspecialty distribution indicated that retina, oculoplastic, cataract, and optometry services were most offered by acquired practices, particularly in urban areas. Satellite expansions further demonstrated a strong urban focus, resulting in a threefold higher number of urban satellites compared with rural ones (P = 0.03).

conclusionsPrivate equity activity continues to favor urban, subspecialty-rich practices, while rural investments remain limited. As overall deal volume has declined since 2021-likely influenced by rising interest rates and pandemic-related economic factors-further research is needed to clarify how PE ownership affects care quality, patient outcomes, and practice sustainability. Addressing rural-urban disparities in ophthalmic and optometric care delivery may require targeted policy interventions to ensure equitable access for all patients.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityOphthalmologyRural Health ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationUnited StatesUrban PopulationHealthcare accessibilityOphthalmologyPrivate equity acquisitionsRural-urban disparitiesSubspecialty trends

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.