ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Dynamic Ensemble Selection for Early Detection of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Fracture Patients.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in fracture patients is often clinically silent, with a high incidence of thrombosis and associated mortality. Static machine learning methods struggle to address the challenge of early DVT diagnosis due to their inability to adapt to heterogeneous data across patients. In contrast, Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) improves clinical decision-making and therapeutic interventions by dynamically adapting to variations in data characteristics. Here, we developed and validated a risk prediction model for DVT using electronic medical record data from fracture patients upon admission. By employing the DES method to optimize the prediction process, the model generates patient-specific probabilities of DVT occurrence, enabling personalized clinical risk assessment. Validation results showed that the DES model achieved strong performance in predicting DVT, with an accuracy of 0.875 and an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.906. Notably, it demonstrated a high recall of 0.918 for DVT. Furthermore, in the prospective test set, DES exhibited excellent generalization capability, maintaining robust performance with an accuracy of 0.813 and an AUC of 0.876. We further developed an interactive clinical tool based on the DES algorithm to facilitate model interpretation and implementation. By integrating this user-friendly solution into clinical workflows, DES not only improves early DVT detection but also optimizes the allocation of healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533054What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.