ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Occurrence and Haematology of Canine Tick-Borne Protozoa in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occurrence and Haematology of Canine Tick-Borne Protozoa in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dogs, being companion animals, serve a variety of economic, social and cultural purposes. However, diseases caused by the tick-borne protozoans are drawing attention globally due to their zoonotic transmission. In this context, the present study aimed to observe the occurrence of tick-borne protozoan infections as well as some selective haematological parameters of stray dogs in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. A total of 160 dogs from various places were selected randomly and examined for both tick and protozoan infection. Only one species of hard tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, was identified, where 49 (30.62%) among the study population were found to be infested with this tick. Ticks ranging from 1-16 were removed from dogs, where most of the ticks were collected from the neck and chest regions (P < 0.001). On the other hand, examinations of blood smears confirmed three protozoan species (Babesia canis, Babesia gibsoni and Hepatozoon spp.) comprising 23.13% of the overall infection. Among the protozoan species, B. canis (11.88%) was the most prevalent protozoan. Subsequently, only 10.81% of the infected samples showed multiple infections. In both cases, females were more infected than males. Among the haematological parameters, the RBC counts, haemoglobin and PCV of all infected dogs were significantly lower (P < 0.001) compared to the non-infected group. Moreover, the eosinophils of the infected groups showed higher values (11.00 % and 12.70% for protozoa and ticks, respectively) than the normal range, indicating parasitic infections. Therefore, these results suggest the necessity of frequent blood examinations to enhance animals' welfare and disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.