ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Exploring structural diversity and dynamic stability of small-molecule PRMT5 inhibitors through machine learning-based QSAR and molecular modelling.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is a key epigenetic enzyme that catalyses symmetric arginine methylation on histone and non-histone proteins, influencing chromatin organisation, RNA splicing, and oncogenic signalling. Its overexpression and dependency in MTAP-deleted cancers such as glioblastoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma highlight its therapeutic relevance. This study presents an integrative computational framework combining quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modelling, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and network pharmacology to identify potential PRMT5 inhibitors. The best QSAR models based on machine learning techniques used different fingerprint representations and algorithms to describe chemical structures; Random Forest models trained on PubChem and MACCS descriptor combinations provided the most accurate predictions. Analysis of consensus QSAR models identified two highly active PRMT5 inhibitor candidates (CHEMBL4539612 and CHEMBL4577464), with high affinity for binding (- 13.5 to - 13.7 kcal/mol) to the PRMT5 active site and interactions similar to those of the known clinical PRMT5 inhibitor ONAMETOSTAT. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that both candidate molecules-maintained stability throughout the PRMT5 catalytic cleft, due to consistent hydrogen bonding, compact conformations, and low negative binding free energy values determined by MM-GBSA calculations. Network pharmacology analysis indicated that PRMT5 and its interacting partners are mainly associated with histone arginine methylation and spliceosomal assembly, processes that are frequently dysregulated in MTAP-deficient cancers. These findings suggest CHEMBL4539612 and CHEMBL4577464 as promising scaffolds for the development of selective PRMT5 inhibitors in epigenetic cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41533017What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.