ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Machine learning models in predicting viability after testicular torsion: a proof of concept study.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is It Too Late? Machine Learning for Predicting Orchiectomy Versus Testicular Preservation in Acute Torsion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDecision-making for orchiectomy following testicular torsion often relies on subjective clinical evaluations. This study investigates the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in objectively predicting post-torsion testicular viability, aiming to maintain a parenchymal ratio over 80% compared to the contralateral testicle, irrespective of initial appearance and surgical timing.
methodsA prospective database from a single surgeon (2020-2024) covering all patients who underwent detorsion and subsequent bilateral orchidopexy was utilized. Follow-up ultrasounds were conducted at 6 to 12 months post-procedure. Variables included patient age (neonatal, prepubertal, post-pubertal), time from presentation to surgery, and history of torsion-detorsion events. Various ML models-logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and decision trees-were assessed for precision and recall.
resultsThe decision tree model demonstrated the highest accuracy at 90.5%, followed by the regression model at 82.7%, and the k-NN model at 81.4%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the regression model indicated adequate predictability for testicular viability. A crucial finding was the impact of the timing of surgical intervention; surgeries conducted within six hours showed a 100% viability rate (p = 0.001). The patient's age also significantly affected outcomes, with post-pubertal patients showing a highest viability rate of 57.1% (p = 0.041). Detailed performance metrics, such as precision, recall, and F1-scores for each model, further validate the predictive capacity of these ML models.
conclusionPreliminary results suggest that ML models are viable tools for predicting testicular viability post-torsion, significantly enhancing clinical decision-making by providing an objective basis for potentially preserving testicles. Further studies with larger datasets are necessary to confirm and refine these predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41532993What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.