ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Rethinking Prosody Production in Autism: Nuanced Insights From Individual Differences and Network Analysis Approaches.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Right-Hemispheric White Matter Organization Is Associated With Speech Timing in Autistic Children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeProsodic differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals are recognized, but there is a lack of consensus on the specific prosodic features that characterize the "autistic voice" due to widespread heterogeneity and mixed findings. This study seeks to build further understanding of the nuances of prosody in autism through individual differences and network analyses.
methodAcoustic analyses were conducted from 66 school-age autistic and non-autistic children and adolescents' narrative generation. Between-groups analyses of pitch- and timing-related prosodic features were conducted, followed by within-group analyses investigating associations between prosodic features and individual differences in overall language skills. Thereafter, established network analysis methods were adopted to detect the communities of participants based on similar prosodic features.
resultsInitial between-groups analyses revealed greater pitch range and variation among autistic compared to non-autistic participants, as well as slower speech and articulation rates, although subsequent analyses revealed that speech and articulation rates were associated with overall language skills. Similar to Weed et al. (2024), the community detection algorithm identified three communities of participants clustered by prosodic features (pitch variation, speech and articulation rates, jitter), with various proportions of autistic participants in each community that did not effectively distinguish between autistic and non-autistic participants.
conclusionsAlthough between-groups differences consistent with similar previous literature have been indicated, community detection analyses further support the notion that prosody in autism may be "different in different ways." This work highlights the importance of moving beyond group-difference approaches in uncovering nuances to individual differences in prosody via within-group and data-driven analysis approaches. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31011862.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.