Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532977›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

A unifying account of replay as context-driven memory reactivation.

Zhenglong Zhou, Michael J Kahana, Anna C Schapiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Specialized recall procedures.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prioritizing replay when future goals are unknown.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenglong ZhouDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4003-7214
Michael J Kahana *Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8122-9525
Anna C Schapiro *Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-0331

Funding

Associative Processes in Episodic MemoryR01MH055687 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAHANA, MICHAEL JACOB · 2002 to 2024
$7.9M
Learning novel structure across time and sleepR01MH129436 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Anna C Schapiro · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
Associative Processes in Episodic MemoryRF1MH055687 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAHANA, MICHAEL JACOB · 2025 to 2025
$1.1M
National Science Foundation National Graduate Research FellowshipNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH055687NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129436NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH55687NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH055687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During rest and sleep, sequential neural activation patterns corresponding to awake experience re-emerge, and this replay has been shown to benefit subsequent behavior and memory. Whereas some studies show that replay directly recapitulates recent experience, others demonstrate that replay systematically deviates from the temporal structure, the statistics, and even the content of recent experience. Given these disparate characteristics, what is the nature and purpose of replay? Here, we offer a theoretical framework in which replay reflects simple context-guided processes that facilitate memory. We suggest that during awake learning, the brain associates experiences with the contexts in which they are encoded, at encoding rates that vary according to the salience of each experience. During quiescence, replay emerges as the result of a cascade of autonomous bidirectional interactions between contexts and their associated experiences, which in turn facilitates memory consolidation. A computational model instantiating this proposal explains numerous replay phenomena, including findings that existing models fail to account for and observations that have been predominantly construed through the lens of reinforcement learning. Our theory provides a unified, mechanistic framework of how the brain initially encodes and subsequently replays experiences in the service of memory consolidation.

Indexed as

BrainLearningMemoryMemory ConsolidationAnimalsHumansModels, NeurologicalWakefulnesscomputational neurosciencelearning and memoryneurosciencenonereplay

Identifiers

PMID41532977
PMCPMC12803516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.