Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532960›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2026

Trauma and emergency surgical care at rural emergency hospital-eligible facilities: Interstate variation and policy implications for rural health systems.

Nina M Clark, Alexandra H Hernandez, Cody L Mullens, Gordon Riha, John W Scott, Barclay T Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nina M ClarkDepartment of Surgery (N.M.C., A.H.H., J.W.S., B.T.S.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Surgery (C.L.M.), Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy (C.L.M.), and UM National Clinician Scholars Program (C.L.M.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Trauma and General Surgery (G.R.), Billings Clinic, Billings, Montana; and Division of Trauma, Burn, and Critical Care Surgery (J.W.S., B.T.S.), and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (J.W.S.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-554
Alexandra H Hernandez
Cody L Mullens
Gordon Riha
John W Scott
Barclay T Stewart

Funding

Insurance Coverage and Workforce Incentives to Improve Access to Surgical CareR01DK137466 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Andrew Mounir Ibrahim, Jonathan William Scott · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS K08 HS028672NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK137466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTimely access to emergency surgical care is a key metric for health system development and performance. To mitigate the risks of rural hospital closures in the United States, the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act introduced the rural emergency hospital (REH) designation, which promotes closure of inpatient units in small hospitals in favor of emergency and outpatient services via supplemental funding and reimbursement. We investigated trauma and emergency general surgery volumes at REH-eligible hospitals to evaluate the potential impact of REH designation on trauma and emergency general surgery care.

methodsWe used the 2021 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from five geographically diverse states (California, Florida, Iowa, Maryland, and Wisconsin) to select encounters where adult patients were treated for acute injuries or emergency general surgery conditions. We then identified REH-eligible hospitals (critical access hospitals or rural hospitals with <50 inpatient beds), comparing case volumes and patient populations at REH-eligible and -ineligible hospitals.

resultsWe analyzed 2.1 million encounters. Trauma and emergency general surgery encounters at REH-eligible hospitals demonstrated substantial interstate variation, comprising 2% to 37% of statewide hospitalizations and up to 17% of statewide inpatient days, with rural states showing the highest proportions. Compared with ineligible hospitals, REH-eligible hospitals treated a higher proportion of patients who were White (85% vs. 55%), were living in rural areas (79% vs. 8%), and had lower incomes; treated fewer patients operatively (2% vs. 11%); and transferred more patients (5% vs. 3%) (all p  < 0.001).

conclusionHospitals eligible for REH designation contribute substantially to the care of injured and emergency general surgery patients, although this is variable across states. While this policy may preserve emergency services in rural areas, the substantial variation in REH-eligible hospital utilization and the vulnerable populations served necessitate systematic evaluation of impacts on surgical access, transfer protocols, and regional care capacity given the irreversible structural changes inherent in this designation. ( J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2026;100: 768-776. Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognositc and Epidemiologic; Level III.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, RuralWounds and InjuriesAcute Care SurgeryAdultFemaleHealth Facility ClosureHumansMaleUnited StatesRural emergency hospitalrural health policytrauma systems

Identifiers

PMID41532960
PMCPMC13218820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.