Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532863›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Boundary extension during naturalistic viewing.

Akseli Pullinen, Riikka Mononen, Jaana Simola, Linda Henriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akseli PullinenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Riikka MononenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Jaana SimolaDepartment of Education, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Linda HenrikssonDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boundary extension refers to a phenomenon in which individuals are likely to remember an image as having more content beyond its actual borders, mistakenly adding details that might have been just beyond the original edges. Despite the wealth of research published about the topic over many decades, most research has used simple two-dimensional (2D) images as stimuli. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence that boundary extension as a phenomenon generalizes to real-world scenarios with naturalistic viewing behavior. To address this gap, we designed a virtual reality (VR) experiment during which the participants (N = 60) were freely able to visually explore naturalistic three-dimensional indoor environments surrounding them. In the experiment, each participant visited each of the 20 virtual rooms twice: first to view the scene and then to complete a task. Their task during the second visit was to move to the location from which they had originally viewed the scene, hence matching their view of the scene to what they remembered seeing before. Especially for close-up views, participants ended their task at a location where their field of view of the scene was wider compared to the initial view, hence indicating boundary extension. The effect was also greater when the movement direction was forward from a wider field of view than that of the original view. Both findings are consistent with previous research and demonstrate that boundary extension is not limited to looking at 2D images but can also occur during naturalistic viewing scenarios. As our method showed no visible boundaries in the stimuli, our results suggest that the existence of such boundaries is not critical for eliciting boundary extension.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVirtual RealityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41532863
PMCPMC12716452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.