Trial reportSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2026
A Split Face Study Comparing the Effect of a PDLLA Based Product and PLLA on the Nasolabial Fold (NLF).
Trial report in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Split Face Study Comparing the Effect of a PDLLA Based Product and PLLA on the Nasolabial Fold (NLF).Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026Trial
- A Case Series on a Layered Biomaterial Strategy for Midface Rejuvenation: Combining Collagen Stimulators and Hyaluronic Acid.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- PLLA and PDLLA Fillers: Linking Crystallinity and Mechanical Stability to Aggregation, Redispersion, and Collagen Formation.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInjectable Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is effective in restoring mid-face volume and is widely used treating the nasolabial fold (NLF). This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of a novel PDLLA based product (PDLLA + non-cross-linked HA; Poly-D, L-lactic acid + hyaluronic acid) with that of a commonly used PLLA for NLF correction.
methodsIn this multi-center, randomized, split-face, evaluator-blinded study, 33 subjects received injections of the PDLLA based product on one NLF and PLLA injection on the other (three injections total, administered at 4-week intervals). Wrinkle severity was assessed using standardized photographs taken at baseline (week 0); before the second and third injections (weeks 4 and 8); 4 weeks after the third injection (week 12); and 3 months after the final injection (week 24) using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). Safety data were collected through subject interviews and case report forms.
resultsBoth the PDLLA based product and PLLA significantly improved NLF wrinkle severity at all time points compared to baseline (p < 0.001). The degree of improvement was comparable between the two products throughout the observation period.
conclusionThe PDLLA based product demonstrated non-inferiority to PLLA for NLF correction. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.