ReviewJournal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2026
Current Trends, Future Prospects and Constraints of Whole Microalgae and Their Fractions as a Functional Feed Ingredient for Animals.
Review in Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microalgae are a highly diverse group of unicellular organisms that grow in a wide range of aquatic environments and are widely used as dietary supplements for both human and animal applications. Microalgae are rich in lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and other valuable bioactive components such as pigments, antioxidants and vitamins. Those components have shown bioactivity not only by affecting cell, organ and tissue functionality but also have notable antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties, positioning microalgae as a potential natural antibiotic substitute. Although production costs of microalgae are high, it has been shown that relatively low (< 1%) inclusion levels of microalgae in the diet of animals affect physiological functions and performance. Microalgae can be fed as whole biomass but also as a fraction (the lipid, protein, carbohydrate or rest fraction). Feedings a fraction of microalgae may be beneficial when only a specific bioactivity of a fraction is required in animals, thereby reducing the cost of feed. For instance, when microalgae are fractionated for human applications, the resulting byproducts or 'side-stream fractions', present a cost-effective feed alternative for livestock. In addition, feeding microalgae or their fractions during periods when young animals are more susceptible to health issues can not only enhance cost-effectiveness but also potentially support their recovery. The aims of this review are (i) to present an overview of the mode of action of the lipid, protein and carbohydrate (rest) fractions of microalgae on whole body physiology, (ii) to summarize previous research on the bioactivity of dietary fractions of microalgae in livestock production and (iii) to propose novel strategies to use whole microalgae biomass or their fractions as functional feed to support resilience in young growing animals during vulnerable health episodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.