ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Assessment of the Catalan Version of the Wound-QoL-17.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of the Spanish Version of the Wound-QoL-14 Wound-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex chronic wounds are an increasing health concern, affecting individuals both physically and psychologically. To measure the quality of life of this population properly translated and validated questionnaires in their native language are needed. The aim of this work is to provide a validated instrument for measuring the quality of life in the Catalan speaking population with complex wounds. A cultural adaptation of the Wound-QoL-17 questionnaire into Catalan was carried out by independent official translators and the back translation was approved by the original author. Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility were assessed. Face and content validity were determined by a group of experts: the 17 items of the Wound-QoL-17 Catalan version were appropriate for their purpose. Reliability was demonstrated by an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.884 for the scores obtained by two different observers and of 0.928 for the same observer on two time points. Chronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.926. Responsiveness was proved by a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.661. Feasibility was shown by the time, 3.46 min, taken to complete the questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.