ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2026
Risk Perception and Susceptibility to Peer Influence Predict Substance Use in Early Adolescence: Findings From the ABCD Study.
Dakota Kliamovich, Scott A Jones, Mizan Gaillard, Amanda C Del Giacco, Arturo Lopez Flores, Bonnie J Nagel
Abstract read
In one paragraphArticle in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
6 authors.
Dakota KliamovichDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Scott A JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Mizan GaillardCenter for Mental Health Innovation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Amanda C Del GiaccoDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Arturo Lopez FloresDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Bonnie J NagelDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Funding
ABCD-USA Consortium: Coordinating CenterU24DA041147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SANDRA A BROWN, TERRY L. JERNIGAN · 2015 to 2026
$54.7MABCD-USA Consortium: Data Analysis, Informatics and Resource CenterU24DA041123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ANDERS M DALE · 2015 to 2026
$51.5MAdolescent Substance Use Initiation: Disentangling neurocognitive risks from consequences using longitudinal and genetically-informed methodsU01DA041120 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Sylia Wilson · 2015 to 2026
$34.5MABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041089 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Joanna Jacobus, Susan F. Tapert · 2015 to 2026
$31.7MProspective Research Studies of Maturation (PRISM)- Research ProjectU01DA041134 · NIDA · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ERIN MCGLADE, PERRY FRANKLIN RENSHAW · 2015 to 2026
$29.2MABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECTU01DA041048 · NIDA · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI Megan Marie Herting, ELIZABETH R SOWELL · 2015 to 2026
$28.7MABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mary M Heitzeg, Chandra Sekhar Sripada · 2015 to 2026
$24.9MFIU-ABCD: Pathways and Mechanisms to Addiction in the Latino Youth of South FloridaU01DA041156 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Raul Gonzalez, Angela R Laird · 2015 to 2026
$22.8MABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041148 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Damien A Fair, Rebekah S Huber · 2015 to 2026
$22.3MABCD-USA: NYC Research ProjectU01DA041174 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Arielle Ryan Baskin-Sommers, Betty J Casey · 2015 to 2026
$19.7MAdolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Prospective Research in Studies of Maturation (PRISM) ConsortiumU01DA041117 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LINDA CHANG, THOMAS M ERNST · 2015 to 2026
$19.5M15/21 ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project Site at LIBRU01DA050989 · NIDA · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI ROBIN L AUPPERLE, MARTIN P. PAULUS · 2020 to 2026
$14.7MNCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002371NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041022NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041025NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041028NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041048NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041089NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041093NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041106NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041117NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041120NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041134NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041148NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041156NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041174NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050987NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050988NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050989NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051016NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051018NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051037NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051038NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051039NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041123NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041147NIH HHS S10 OD034224NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH138026
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
objectiveExperimentation with alcohol and other substances during the early adolescent period is associated with myriad potentially deleterious health outcomes. The present analysis used data from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study) to examine the relationships among risk perception, susceptibility to peer influence, and substance use in early adolescence.
methodParticipants completed a Social Influence Task (SIT) in which they were asked to rate the riskiness of various hypothetical scenarios. They were then presented with a risk rating purportedly provided by their peers and asked to rate each scenario again. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationships among risk perception (initial risk rating), susceptibility to peer influence (risk rating change), and future substance use.
resultsHigher initial risk perception was associated with lower odds of future substance use. Greater susceptibility to peer influence in the positive direction (i.e., being more swayed by peers to rate a scenario as more risky than the participant had originally decided) was also associated with lower odds of future substance use.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the potential importance of leveraging positive peer influence to affect substance use outcomes.
Indexed as
Adolescent BehaviorPeer GroupPeer InfluenceRisk-TakingSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentFemaleHumansMale
Identifiers
PMID41532693
PMCPMC13001071
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390