Trial reportPhysiological research2025
Trunk Impairment Scale and Stroke Impact Scale for Clinical Assessment of Patients in the Subacute Stage After Stroke Following Sensory Intervention.
Trial report in Physiological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke survivors frequently present with impaired trunk control, which is a key determinant of mobility, balance, and independence in activities of daily living (ADL). Reliable clinical tools are therefore needed to evaluate postural stability, particularly in patients unable to stand. This randomized controlled study assessed the applicability of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) in post-stroke patients after completion of a complementary sensory intervention targeting sitting postural stability. Forty inpatients in the subacute stage after stroke were randomized into an Experimental group receiving daily postural training with visual biofeedback in addition to standard physiotherapy, and a Control group receiving standard physiotherapy only. Assessments included TIS and SIS at baseline and post-intervention. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in trunk control, mobility, strength and ADL over time, as reflected by higher TIS and SIS scores. However, the Experimental group achieved greater gains, with the most pronounced effects observed in TIS, as well as SIS Mobility, and SIS ADL domains. Mobility improvements were strongly associated with enhanced ADL performance, underscoring the relevance of trunk control rehabilitation. These findings confirm the clinical sensitivity of TIS and SIS in capturing meaningful postural changes associated with functional recovery after stroke. This study demonstrates that targeted trunk-focused interventions with complementary sensory input can significantly enhance both motor and functional outcomes in stroke survivors. Combining TIS and SIS provides a comprehensive evaluation of clinical performance and patient-reported outcomes, offering valuable insight for rehabilitation strategies aimed at improving independence and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41532635PMC12849785What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.