Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532625›Full record

ReviewPhysiological research2025

From Synapsia to Ideas: Nitric Oxide and Sensory Roots of Knowledge.

F Jagla, O Pecháňová

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F JaglaCentre of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
O Pecháňová

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The famous Czech writer Milan Kundera in his essay The Abused Heritage of Cervantes wrote: The boom of sciences drove a man into the tunnel of specialized disciplines [1]. With increasing specialization, many doctors come into a contact with the same patients only episodically. In addition, there are also time limits for individual patients. There is no time to apply knowledge across different levels and areas. The happiness of science is that there are no such limitations and our meeting is witnessing it. In contrast, research on nitric oxide (NO) demonstrates that a transdisciplinary approach is not only possible, but also necessary: in the case of NO it combines cardiovascular physiology, neuroscience, molecular biology, psychology and even noetics. Nitric oxide (NO) in the brain is synthesized mainly by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS). It activates ion channels and regulates the expression of proteins important for axonal and dendritic growth, thereby supporting the formation of new neural connections crucial for learning and memory. NO mediates long-term potentiation (LTP) as a retrograde signal: formed in the postsynaptic membrane, it diffuses back to the presynaptic neuron, increasing neurotransmitter release and strengthening synaptic connections (the so-called Hebbian principle - neurons that fire together, wire together). Through activation of guanylate cyclase, NO increases cGMP levels, which in turn activate protein kinase G (PKG), modulating ion channels and protein activity involved in synaptic plasticity and memory. Inhibition of nNOS after learning disrupts long-term memory consolidation, indicating its key role in transforming labile memory traces into more permanent ones [2,3]. The contribution of NO extends beyond synaptic plasticity. Changes in nNOS activity and glial reactivity in animal models of ADHD suggest that altered NO production may be associated with attention disorders. The coupling of attention and memory is strong, and NO acts as a neuromodulator affecting the release of various neurotransmitters, influencing mood, motivation and cognition. Older individuals with mild to moderate cognitive impairment show significantly lower levels of NO metabolites compared to healthy age-matched controls. This suggests that adequate NO availability supports attention, memory and cognitive functions, and may exert protective effects against neurodegenerative diseases [4,5]. As John Locke [6] formulated: Nothing exists in the mind which was not first in the senses. Sensualistic noetics, as the basis of modern philosophy, emphasizes experience as the source of knowledge and moral action. Research on NO extends this idea by uncovering biological mechanisms that enable sensory experience to be encoded, consolidated and integrated. NO provides the molecular basis for learning, memory and attention - the very tools through which philosophical reflection and knowledge are possible. Thus, NO research illustrates the "mechanism of experience" at the level of synapses, neurons and vascular regulation, linking biology with cognition and higher intellectual functions. This clearly demonstrates that a transdisciplinary combination of medicine, neuroscience, psychology and philosophy can overcome the "tunnel vision" of specialization that Kundera criticized.

Indexed as

BrainNitric OxideAnimalsHumansNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID41532625
PMCPMC12849795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.