Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532610›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026

Gender-Affirming Feminization Voice Surgery: A Scoping Review of Preoperative Assessments.

Jadin Chahade, Hedieh Keshavars, Janice Y Kung, Teresa L D Hardy, Caroline C Jeffery

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jadin ChahadeFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-4469-4971
Hedieh KeshavarsFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Janice Y KungGeoffrey & Robyn Sperber Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Teresa L D HardyFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0768-6909
Caroline C JefferyFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the preoperative assessments and criteria surgeons use to assess the suitability of transfeminine patients for voice feminization surgery. DATA SOURCES: Electronic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PubMed excluding MEDLINE records was performed on February 11, 2025 for articles that were published from inception to the search date. No language or date limits were applied. STUDY SELECTION: The inclusion criteria were developed using the PICOTS framework. Inclusion criteria included all studies reporting (1) assessments and surgical criteria used in; (2) transfeminine adult patients who; (3) underwent feminization voice surgery. Studies involving transmasculine patients and those addressing nonsurgical interventions for voice were excluded. Non-feminization voice surgeries were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Screening and extraction followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines by two authors. Extracted data included study type, origin, and intervention. Clinical criteria were emphasized, including voice training, acoustic and perceptual parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. Other factors included medical/psychiatric evaluation and hormonal therapy.

resultsOf 520 studies screened, 42 met inclusion. Most were retrospective case series/reports (2000-2025) with sample sizes from 1 to 506. Acoustic parameters, especially fundamental frequency, were commonly assessed. Perceptual tools included GRBAS, CAPE-V, and clinician judgment by speech-language pathologists. Patient-reported outcomes such as the Voice Handicap Index and Trans Woman Voice Questionnaire were also used. Endoscopic evaluation was frequently performed, and CT imaging was often used for cricothyroid approximation cases.

conclusionsThere is significant variability in preoperative criteria across studies, with limited reporting on key factors like prior voice training or psychological evaluation.

Indexed as

FeminizationGender-Affirming SurgeryPreoperative CareFemaleHumansMaleTransgender PersonsVoice QualityVoice Trainingfeminization voice surgerygender affirming surgerygender dysphoriavoice‐gender incongruence

Identifiers

PMID41532610
PMCPMC13158836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.