ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Sex Differences in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Report of the iSCAD Registry.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of fear of recurrence and progression on mental health after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: the role of illness uncertainty.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Report of the iSCAD Registry.JAMA cardiology · 2026Article
- Clinical Decision-Making and Imaging-Guided Follow-Up Strategies in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous coronary artery dissection is a cause of myocardial infarction, which predominantly affects middle-aged women. There are limited data on men with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
methodsInformation on demographics, presenting characteristics, in-hospital outcomes including major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or heart failure), length of stay, and discharge medications in men and women were obtained from the multicenter iSCAD (International Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection) registry.
resultsOf 1252 patients enrolled from 2019 to 2023, 80 (6.4%) were men. Mean age did not significantly differ between sexes (men, 50.2±10.3 versus women 49.7±10.4;
conclusionsIn a large spontaneous coronary artery dissection registry, there were significant sex differences in presentation, baseline medical conditions, and triggers. In-hospital outcomes were similar, but length of stay was longer for women. Men were more often discharged on statins and dual antiplatelet therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.