Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532516›Full record

ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health

Guiding Midwives to Precept Students: Two Evidence-Based Models.

Margaret C Taylor, Hannah L Diaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margaret C TaylorVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee.
Hannah L DiazVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-6023-3370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of midwifery education relies heavily on the time and expertise shared by experienced midwifery preceptors. Although there are several known and documented barriers to preceptor availability and willingness to participate in the education of future midwives, clinical education opportunities are crucial to midwifery education. Mentorship and training from preceptors not only benefit the students but also contributes to the development of a well-prepared, compassionate midwifery workforce. Advocates for growing the US midwifery workforce point to the alarming rate of maternity health care deserts, in which families lack access to maternity health care providers and maternity care services. Midwives are the logical solution to fill this health care gap, but this requires the growth of midwifery education programs and clinical preceptors. Recognizing the importance of precepting and easing the role of the preceptor with recommended teaching methods can lighten the burden and make the precepting experience more beneficial. Health profession education has used various preceptor models to guide learning interactions, but there is not a specific model for midwifery clinical education. Midwives need standardized, reliable, and consistent methods that engage students, promote critical thinking skills, and create positive learning experiences. In this article, we propose and discuss the use of 2 evidence-based models: the One-Minute Preceptor method and the Summarize, Narrow, Analyze, Probe, Plan, Select method to facilitate and support the role of the preceptor. Investing in preceptors is an investment in the future of quality midwifery care.

Indexed as

Education, NursingMentorsMidwiferyModels, EducationalNurse MidwivesPreceptorshipStudents, NursingClinical CompetenceFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID41532516
PMCPMC13067915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.