ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
A cross-specialty, evidence-based Delphi consensus of a care bundle to reduce surgical site infections.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical site infections (SSI) are among the most frequently observed healthcare associated infections and represent a significant target to reduce the impact of antimicrobial resistance. Use of a surgical care bundle has demonstrated efficacy in reduction in SSI, but there is a lack of consensus on which elements should be included within such a bundle. The aim of this international consensus was to determine what factors should be utilized to produce an optimal, evidence-led bundle of care that can be utilized in a multidisciplinary manner across specialties and across countries.
methodsThe process employed a modified Delphi methodology. Based on published high-level evidence an international multidisciplinary steering group developed 38 statements for testing with a wider responder panel of healthcare professionals in Europe. The threshold for consensus agreement was set at 75%.
resultsA total of 820 responses were analyzed, with the majority of participants being surgeons (59%) and nurses (19.1%) from across Europe. The consensus process evaluated 36 finalized statements covering preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative SSI prevention practices. Overall, 33 out of 36 statements (92%) reached the predefined consensus threshold of 75% agreement. A high agreement was observed across multiple roles and specialties, although some variation existed for specific topics such as antiseptic irrigation, use of antimicrobial sutures, and plastic adhesive drapes.
conclusionThis large consensus of European HCPs involved in the surgical care of patients achieved strong levels of consensus across most of the proposed statements on elements of an SSI prevention bundle. These practice recommendations could be adopted as an evidence- and expert-based care bundle for the prevention of SSI. The project was registered at www.researchregistry.com.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.