ArticleItalian journal of food safety2026
Evaluation of the use of "best before" in ready-to-eat foods of the retail market.
Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The correct indication of the commercial life of some products, although specifically regulated by Regulation (EU) 1169/2011, could be difficult to apply for the Food Business Operator. The consequence is to attribute a "date of minimum durability" (DMD) to some foods, which, being perishable from a microbiological point of view, should carry a "use by" date, as they could represent a potential risk for the consumer. This study aims to evaluate the correct use of the "best before" date instead of the "use by" date in different ready-to-eat (RTE) foods, for which it is conceivable that they perish after that date. The analysis was carried out on 43 RTE products, divided into 26 dairy and 17 meat products (4 raw cured and 13 cooked), which had the term "best before" and were characterized by medium perishability, purchasing two sampling units of the same lot to carry out microbiological, chemical-physical, and sensory analyses. The first sampling unit was analyzed at the expiry of the DMD, and the second one 7 days later by storing the sample at 7°C (DMD+7), simulating a condition of thermal abuse at the domestic storage level. The results of the microbiological analysis showed that 13 cooked meat products at DMD 3 (ID 3 - roast turkey; ID 6 - Lyoner; ID 9 - cooked shoulder) and 4 (ID 3 - roast turkey; ID 6 - Lyoner; ID 9 - cooked shoulder; ID 12 - mortadella) at the DMD and DMD+7, respectively, presented "unsatisfactory" microbial loads, such as to be considered "in a state of alteration" according to the Ce.I.R.S.A guideline. Regarding 26 dairy products, at DMD only one sample (ID 20 - sweet gorgonzola) was to be considered "in a state of alteration", while at DMD+7 the samples were 2 (ID 20 - sweet gorgonzola; ID 24 - Brie cheese). Microbiological results were confirmed by the sensory analysis. The state of alteration found in the products examined means that they fully fall within the definition of unsafe food as reported in Regulation (EC) 178/2002, which therefore requires that they be marketed with the "use by" date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.