Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Effectiveness and adherence in a tirzepatide-supported digital weight-loss programme in Australia: A real-world observational study.
Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peer Referral Pathways and 6-Month Outcomes in a Tirzepatide-Supported Digital Weight Loss Service: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Digital Engagement Phenotypes and 6-Month Weight Loss in a Tirzepatide-Supported Digital Weight-Loss Program: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Rates of, Reasons for, and Reactions to Discontinuation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Narrative Review.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness and 12-Month Persistence of a Semaglutide-Supported Digital Weight-Loss Service: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Germany.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsObesity is a growing global health crisis; pharmacotherapies such as tirzepatide combined with multidisciplinary lifestyle support have shown promise but real-world evidence in digital weight-loss services (DWLSs) is limited. This retrospective study evaluated 6- and 12-month weight loss, adherence and predictors of outcomes in an Australian cohort using a tirzepatide-supported medicated DWLS. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll patients initiating tirzepatide through the Juniper AU DWLS between 1 September 2024 and 23 April 2025 (n = 4309) were analysed. The study population was predominantly female (92.9%) and Caucasian (81.9%), with a mean age of 41.46 years and a mean baseline body mass index of 32.9 kg/m
resultsAt 6 months, 31.7% met adherence criteria; mean weight loss among adherent patients was 16.9% (±8.6; 95% CI 16.6-17.2), with 98.0% achieving ≥5% weight reductions. At 12 months, 16.1% were adherent; mean weight loss was 22.7% (±7.2; 95% CI: 19.8-22.6) and 100% of patients reached the ≥5% milestone. Multivariable models identified 1-month weight loss as the strongest predictor of 6- and 12-month outcomes; sustained weekly weight tracking and health coach messaging were strongly associated with both retention and greater weight loss. Paradoxically, very frequent weight tracking in month one correlated with poorer outcomes and reduced retention. Side effects were common but mostly mild/moderate and did not correlate with weight loss or programme retention.
conclusionsTirzepatide plus multidisciplinary digital care yields large clinically meaningful weight loss among engaged users, but low adherence limits population-level effectiveness. Early clinical response and sustained engagement are key drivers of adherence; however, interventions are needed to manage early weight-loss expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.