ArticleClinical transplantation2026
Prolonged Invasive Mechanical Ventilation is Associated With Decreased Survival After Lung Transplantation Among Recipients With Primary Graft Dysfunction: A Lung Transplant Outcomes Group Study.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhalable PD-L1-engineered hybrid cellular vesicles suppress excessive neutrophil activation and restore mitochondrial homeostasis to alleviate ischemia-reperfusion lung injury and pneumonia.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Prolonged Invasive Mechanical Ventilation is Associated With Decreased Survival After Lung Transplantation Among Recipients With Primary Graft Dysfunction: A Lung Transplant Outcomes Group Study.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionProlonged invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) after lung transplantation is an appealing early prognostic outcome as it can be reproducibly assessed both prospectively and retrospectively. Whether use of IMV at 72 h after lung transplantation is associated with post-transplant graft survival is unknown.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 1511 participants in the multi-center Lung Transplant Outcomes Group cohort (2011-2018). Using Cox proportional hazards models and restricted mean survival time, we investigated whether IMV at 72 h was associated with post-transplant graft survival. We secondarily evaluated whether IMV at 72 h was concordant with severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD).
resultsParticipants requiring IMV at 72 h after transplant were sicker at transplantation (higher lung allocation score [LAS], increased extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or IMV bridge) and more likely to have severe PGD. Use of IMV at 72 h was associated with 55% (95% CI 26%-92%) increased hazards of death or re-transplantation after adjustment for age, ECMO, diagnosis, LAS, and intra-operative transfusion. The association between IMV and graft survival was modified by severe PGD (p-for interaction 0.002) but not by pre-transplant ECMO (p-for interaction 0.88) or pre-transplant IMV (p-for interaction 0.92). IMV was associated with increased risk of death or re-transplantation among those with PGD (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.43-3.85) but not among those without PGD (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.77-1.41).
conclusionRequirement of IMV at 72 h is an important early post-transplant outcome associated with post-transplant survival. This appears driven by those with severe PGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.