Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532214›Full record

ArticleSmall methods2026

Improving Cycle Life and Capacity Retention in PVMPO‖Li Dual-Ion Lithium-Organic Batteries Using an EC-Free and FEC Additive Containing Electrolyte.

Sathiya Priya Panjalingam, Somayeh Ahadi, Jakob Michael Hesper, Uta Rodehorst, Sascha Nowak, Birgit Esser, Martin Winter, Peter Bieker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sathiya Priya PanjalingamMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9591-7303
Somayeh AhadiInstitute of Organic Chemistry II and Advanced Materials, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Jakob Michael HesperMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0457-3219
Uta RodehorstMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3111-8098
Sascha NowakMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-6073
Birgit EsserInstitute of Organic Chemistry II and Advanced Materials, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2430-1380
Martin WinterMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Peter BiekerMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-4805

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation 390874152Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation 445470598Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation 445471097Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation 445471845Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation 528773185Ministry for Culture and Science of North Rhine-Westphalia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrolytes critically influence the electrochemical performance and cycle life of lithium ion batteries (LIBs). This holds especially for organic redox polymer-based batteries, such as those employing poly(3-vinyl-N-methylphenoxazine) (PVMPO), where solubility limits performance in conventional ethylene carbonate (EC)/ dimethyl carbonate (DMC)-based electrolytes. Reducing EC content has shown solubility suppression when using ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) as a co-solvent, however, capacity fading persists due to PVMPO electrode degradation. To address this degradation, this study explores the use of EC-free electrolytes, with and without fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). Electrochemical investigations, UltraViolet/Visible (UV/Vis) spectroscopy, post-cycling Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) mapping, and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) analyses are employed to evaluate solubility, interfacial properties, and electrode integrity. The EC-free electrolyte system with FEC retains 95 mAh g

Indexed as

dual‐ion batteryEC‐free electrolyteFEClithium‐organic batteryPVMPO

Identifiers

PMID41532214
PMCPMC12893304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.