ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Application of radiomics-based image filtering to improve deformable image registration accuracy in thoracic images.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Deformable image registration (DIR) is an important technique in radiation therapy. To improve DIR accuracy, we applied radiomics-based image filtering as a preprocessing step before DIR. Materials and methods: Thoracic four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images of 10 patients with lung or esophageal cancer were examined. Peak-inhale and peak-exhale images were used for DIR. Before DIR, these images were converted into 90-voxel-based radiomics-based filtered images using extracted local radiomics features, respectively. On each filtered image, DIR between the peak-inhale and peak-exhale filtered images was performed. After DIR, the peak-inhale CT images were deformed to peak-exhale CT images using the displacement vector fields obtained from the DIR. The registration errors obtained from each radiomics-based DIR were calculated using landmark pairs and compared with conventional CT-based DIR using the same DIR parameters. Results: In radiomics-based DIR, the lowest registration errors (95th percentile) for intensity and texture features were 0.96 mm (right-left), 1.35-1.38 mm (anterior-posterior), 2.04-2.13 mm (superior-inferior), and 2.49-2.57 mm (three-dimensional). For CT-based DIR, the corresponding registration errors were 1.31 mm, 1.72 mm, 3.45 mm, and 3.98 mm. Conclusions: By applying radiomics-based image filtering before DIR as a preprocessing, the registration error was lower than that of conventional CT-based DIR, suggesting that using radiomics may improve the accuracy of DIR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.