ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
High-throughput spontaneous Raman imaging of biological specimens with water background reduction.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal live-cell chemical imaging using coherent Raman scattering microscopy.The Analyst · 2026Review
- Label-Free Hyperspectral Raman Imaging and Analysis of a 3D Spheroid Model for Liver Fibrosis Study.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Spatially multiplexed random-access Raman probe for in vivo tissue measurements.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In multiline-illumination Raman microscopy, background signals from the out-of-focus planes limit the throughput of cell imaging. Here, we improved the throughput of cell imaging by reducing background signals originating from the sample buffer solution and immersion medium of the objective lens. The background from water was suppressed by restricting the thickness of the sample buffer layer. In addition, the background signal in the CH stretching region was suppressed by replacing H
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.