ReviewERJ open research2026
Social determinants of health in clinical trials examining long-term oral antibiotics in COPD: a systematic review.
Review in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Social determinants of health (SDH) including age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, education, occupation and rural status impact the development and prognosis of COPD. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether SDH are reported or considered in clinical trials examining the efficacy of long-term oral antibiotics (LTOA) in people with COPD. Methods: A search of three clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov, ANZCTR, ISRCTN) and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted for trials involving LTOA prescribed to people with COPD registered between 1 January 2000 and 7 May 2023. Data were extracted regarding trial location, recruitment strategies and eligibility criteria. Where available, reporting of SDH data and relevant subgroup analyses were extracted. Results: From 781 trials identified, 17 trials were included in this review. Most (94.1%) were conducted in high-income countries alone. 94.1% of trials described age and gender, and 12.5% described ethnicity within recruitment strategies or eligibility criteria. No other SDH were reported in recruitment or eligibility criteria. Of seven completed trials with publicly available results (n=2888), all reported age and gender and 42.9% reported ethnicity; no other SDH were reported. Participants were predominantly male (66.3%) and white (72.6% to 99.0%). Conclusion: There was limited reporting of SDH in clinical trials investigating the efficacy of LTOA in people with COPD, and those that did report this information demonstrated limited participant diversity. Consequently, the safety and effectiveness of LTOA in under-represented patient populations remain unclear. Proactive recruitment of diverse populations and greater transparency in trials' reporting of participant demographics is needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.