ArticleBiology methods & protocols2026
A hybrid framework for disease biomarker discovery in microbiome research combining Bayesian networks, machine learning, and network-based methods.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating microbial network inference methods: moving beyond synthetic data with reproducibility-driven benchmarks.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome research faces two central challenges, namely constructing reliable networks, where nodes represent microbial taxa and edges represent their associations, and identifying significant disease-associated taxa. To address the first challenge, we developed CMIMN, a novel R package that applies a Bayesian network framework based on conditional mutual information to infer microbial interaction networks. To further enhance reliability, we construct a consensus microbiome network by integrating results from CMIMN and three widely used methods, including Sparse Inverse Covariance Estimation for Ecological Association Inference (SPIEC-EASI), Semi-Parametric Rank-based correlation and partial correlation Estimation (SPRING), and Sparse Correlations for Compositional Data (SPARCC). This consensus approach, which overlays and weights edges shared across methods, reduces inconsistencies and provides a more biologically meaningful view of microbial relationships. To address the second challenge, we designed a multi-method feature selection framework that combines machine learning with network-based strategies. Our machine learning pipeline applies distinct algorithms and identifies key taxa based on their consistent importance across models. Complementing this, we employ two network-based strategies that prioritize taxa based on centrality differences between networks constructed from healthy samples and disease-affected samples, as well as a composite scoring system that ranks nodes using integrated network metrics. We applied CMIMN on soil microbiome data from potato fields affected by common scab disease. Bootstrap analysis confirmed the robustness of CMIMN, and the consensus network further improved stability and interpretability. The multi-method framework enhances confidence in identifying soil microbial taxa associated with potato disease. Notably, we identified
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.