Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532034›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in drug safety and regulation2025

Cohort event monitoring of booster COVID-19 vaccine safety using patient-reported outcomes in pregnant women.

Emeline Maisonneuve, Nicoletta Luxi, Chiara Bellitto, Francesco Ciccimarra, Monika Raethke, Florence van Hunsel, Thomas Lieber, Erik Mulder, Fabio Riefolo, Felipe Villalobos and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in drug safety and regulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Emeline MaisonneuveMaterno-fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, "Woman-Mother-Child" Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicoletta LuxiDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Chiara BellittoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Francesco CiccimarraDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Monika RaethkeNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Florence van HunselNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Thomas LieberNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Erik MulderNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Fabio RiefoloTeamit Institute, Partnerships, Barcelona Health Hub, Barcelona, Spain.
Felipe VillalobosFundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain.
Nicolas H ThurinBordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC-P 1401, University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Francisco Batel-MarquesLaboratory of Social Pharmacy and Public Health, School of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Kathryn MortonDrug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Fergal O'ShaughnessyPharmacy Department, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Brian ClearyPharmacy Department, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Simona SonderlichováFaculty of Medicine, SLOVACRIN, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, Slovakia.
Andreea FarcasPharmacovigilance Research Center, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Camelia BucsaPharmacovigilance Research Center, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Guillaume FavreMaterno-fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, "Woman-Mother-Child" Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Satu J SiiskonenDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
David BaudMaterno-fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, "Woman-Mother-Child" Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Miriam C J M SturkenboomDepartment of Data Science and Biostatistics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Gianluca Trifirò *Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alice Panchaud *Institute of Primary Healthcare (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 vaccination is still accepted by only half of pregnant women. Further scientific evidence on the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine could help overcome vaccine hesitancy in this population. Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe and compare the incidence of solicited and unsolicited adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious adverse reactions following the booster dose of different COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women versus the general female population. Methods: We conducted a web-based prospective observational cohort study. In eight European countries, pregnant women and non-pregnant women from the same source population who received a first or second booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine between February 2021 and February 2023 were included in the study if they registered within 48 h after vaccination and completed at least the baseline questionnaire and one follow-up questionnaire. The exposure was a mRNA COVID-19 vaccine of different brands used for a booster dose. The proportion of solicited and unsolicited ADRs following the booster dose by vaccine brand was computed across participating countries in pregnant and non-pregnant women. We performed descriptive analyses of medical characteristics of vaccinees. We compared the proportions of local and systemic solicited ADRs and unsolicited ADRs in pregnant vaccinees with a random sample (1:4 ratio) of age- and vaccine brand-matched vaccinees from the general female population. Results: Overall, 358 pregnant women were matched with 1,432 women from the general population. The proportion of women who reported at least one solicited adverse event was significantly lower in the pregnant group in the non-pregnant group (56.4% [95%CI 51.3%-61.5%] versus 72.3% [95%CI 70.0%-74.6%], p = 0.01). Regarding local ADRs, pregnant women reported significantly less pain and swelling. As for systemic ADRs, pregnant women reported all symptoms less frequently than non-pregnant women, except nausea. The proportion of women who reported at least one unsolicited adverse event was less frequent in the pregnant group (7.8% [95%CI 5.0%-10.6%] versus 24.9% [95%CI 22.7%-27.1%], p = 3.10 Conclusion: This prospective study on COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring showed that pregnant women from the general population reported solicited and unsolicited ADRs less frequently than non-pregnant women.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionCOVID-19Covid boosterCOVID vaccinepregnancysafety

Identifiers

PMID41532034
PMCPMC12791168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.