Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41532010›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

A Comparison of the Bouquet Speculum and Traditional Two-Blade Speculum in Medical Student Training for Female Gynecological Exams.

Cassandra Brown, Shivani Dixit, Jennifer Gaide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cassandra BrownCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO, USA.
Shivani DixitCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO, USA.
Jennifer GaideCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the Bouquet Speculum™ to a traditional two-blade speculum on a complex-anatomy vaginal task among preclinical medical students. The novel task trainer was designed and created to simulate obese anatomy for the complicated speculum exam. This study was conducted at Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine in Parker, Colorado. Methods: A novel vaginal model simulating anatomy that is prone to lateral wall collapse was used to compare the speed and preference of a traditional two-blade vaginal speculum to the Bouquet speculum™ among first and second-year medical students (n=47) in a randomized crossover study. Students performed an endometrial biopsy, and quantitative and qualitative measures were recorded including time, speculum preference, difficulty, and confidence. Results: Students successfully placed the endometrial biopsy pipelle faster using the Bouquet speculum™ compared to the traditional two-blade speculum (p < 0.0001). Students self-reported confidence level was significantly associated with faster times, regardless of the speculum used (p=0.0043). Conclusion: The Bouquet Speculum™ significantly reduces the time to completion of an endometrial biopsy performed on a novel vaginal model simulating obese anatomy compared to the traditional two-blade speculum.

Indexed as

gynecologymedical educationsimulationspeculum

Identifiers

PMID41532010
PMCPMC12794563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.