ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026
Impact of tumour proximity to organs-at-risk in adaptive MR-guided SBRT for central lung tumours and metastases.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Centrally located lung tumours present challenges for SBRT due to elevated toxicity risk. Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) offers improved target coverage and Organ at risk (OAR) sparing by accounting for interfractional anatomical changes. This study evaluated the dosimetric impact of oMRgRT, with emphasis on tumour location relative to OARs and the clinical benefit of adaptation. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 36 PTVs across 294 treatment sessions using a 0.35 T MR-Linac. Tumours were categorised by proximity to six critical OARs: proximal bronchial tree (PBT), trachea, heart, great vessels, brachial plexus, and oesophagus. Predicted/reoptimised plans from all fractions were compared to assess improvements in target coverage and OAR sparing. All dosimetric parameters were presented as a percentage of baseline plan metrics. Statistical tests included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney Results: Adaptive planning significantly improved target volume dosimetry. PTV D Conclusion: Daily oMRgRT significantly improves target coverage and OAR sparing in centrally located tumours, especially in anatomically complex regions. The adaptive approach enables clinically meaningful trade-offs between tumour coverage and OAR sparing. Further studies are needed to refine adaptation protocols based on tumour sublocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.